RUMORS More UN Crap

In what would be one of the biggest bonehead move of all time,
the Department of Defense is supposedly surveying their personnel to see how
they feel about using deadly force to disarm Americans,
under the command of the United Nations (UN).

In this current environment of distrust and fear under the Meccachurian's rule,
this would be the equivalent of attempting to put out a fire with gasoline.

We have already seen groups declare their highest emergency levels on this news.
Almost every paranoid fantasy concerning the United Nations has been revisited and declared.
Our in-box has been swamped with reports of blue helmeted foreign troops,
Chinese tanks and Russian infantry fighting vehicles.

While these reports come out of the lunatic fringe of the Preparedness community,
the story on the Department of Defense is this.

A five-page survey called the Joint Services Training Combat Arms Survey form,
is currently making the rounds in the Survivalist, Patriot and Militia communities.

The last few questions on the survey are of the most concern to these communities.

38. It would make no difference to me to take orders from a United Nations company or squadron commander

Strongly Disagree (___) Disagree (___) Agree (___) Strongly Agree (___) No Opinion (___)

39. I feel the President of the United States has the authority to pass his
responsibilities as Commander-in-Chief to the United Nations Secretary General

Strongly Disagree (___) Disagree (___) Agree (___) Strongly Agree (___) No Opinion (___)

40. I feel there is no conflict between my oath of office and serving as a
United Nations soldier
Strongly Disagree (___) Disagree (___) Agree (___) Strongly Agree (___) No Opinion (___)

41. I feel my unit's combat effectiveness would not be affected by performing humanitarian and peace keeping missions for the United Nations

Strongly Disagree (___) Disagree (___) Agree (___) Strongly Agree (___) No Opinion (___)

42. I feel a designated unit of U.S. combat soldiers should be permanently assigned to the
command and control of the United Nations

Strongly Disagree (___) Disagree (___) Agree (___) Strongly Agree (___) No Opinion (___)

43. I would be willing to volunteer for assignment to a U.S. combat unit under a United Nations commander

Strongly Disagree (___) Disagree (___) Agree (___) Strongly Agree (___) No Opinion (___)

44. I would like United Nations member countries, including the U.S. to give the
U.N. all the soldiers necessary to maintain world peace

Strongly Disagree (___) Disagree (___) Agree (___) Strongly Agree (___) No Opinion (___)

45. I would swear to the following code:

"I am a United Nations fighting person. I serve in the forces which maintain
world peace and every nation's way of life. I swear and affirm to support and defend the
Charter of the United Nations and I am prepared to give my life in its defense"

Strongly Disagree (___) Disagree (___) Agree (___) Strongly Agree (___) No Opinion (___)

46. The U.S. government declares a ban on the possession, sale, transportation
and transfer of all non-approved firearms. A 30-day amnesty period is established for these
firearms to be turned over to the local authorities. At the end of this period, a number of
irregular citizen groups and defiant individuals refuse to turn over their firearms to authority.

Consider the following statement:

"I would fire upon U.S. citizens who refuse or resist confiscation of firearms banned by the United States government."

Strongly Disagree (___) Disagree (___) Agree (___) Strongly Agree (___) No Opinion (___)

DD Form 3208A1 (rev 12/05)

As you can plainly see,
the questions on this form are more than enough to fuel every conspiracy theorists wildest scenario.The authenticity of this form cannot be confirmed by other than oral testimony.
The original e-mailed to us contained spelling errors and European spellings.
This immediately puts up a "red flag" for us and a Google search on "Form 3208A1". only brings up two results to Mark Yannone's website.

We would have to rate this one B.S. from some deviant personality looking to stir up trouble.
Even as much as we dislike the UN and the Meccachurian,
do the research on rumors and innuendos.
There is a lot of WRONG information out there.
Some dangerous, some harmless but useless.
But many people believe the wrong information and will suffer when real disaster strikes.

This is not to say that the use of deadly force to disarm citizens,
is not beyond the treachery of the Meccachurian.
Just this particular scenario is "HIGHLY" suspect




A Nationwide Membership Based Organization