If the United Nations (UN) has its way,
it would be a criminal act for any person living in a member nation of the UN to associate terrorism with Islam.
The Meccachurian has been silent on this issue because he could use such a law to target groups like the Connecticut Survivalist Alliance (CSA).
Since his minions cannot find any skeletons in lawful organizations closets, a
UN binding resolution making criticism of Islam a crime would suit his agenda perfectly.
Laws would be passed here in the former United States that would create a whole new class of criminal for simply expressing your First Amendment Rights.
Legal experts say religious defamation laws as vague as the United Nations wants to impose on its members, stand little chance of success because of the free speech protections guaranteed under the First Amendment of the Former U.S. Constitution.
Normally we would agree but with the Meccachurian in charge and such a tool
available to him, do you really expect him NOT to take advantage of it?
"If it walks like a duck, quacks like a duck, and looks like a duck, it must be a duck”
A copy of the United Nations resolution dated Nov. 12, 2008,
says the UN General Assembly, "Notes with deep concern ... the ethnic and religious profiling of Muslim minorities in the aftermath of the tragic events
of 11 September 2001."
In the document, the United Nations also, "Expresses deep concern ... that
Islam is frequently and wrongly associated with human rights violations and terrorism."
Opponents of the United Nations' annual defamation resolutions charge the documents are nothing more than an attempt to shield Islam from criticism and a way to silence its critics.
In a 2007 letter to the U.N. General Assembly, the International Humanist and Ethical Union called the resolutions "unnecessary, flawed, and morally wrong."
Lou Dobbs has a great idea, “How about bulldozing the building that houses the UN?”
A Nationwide Membership Based Organization
No comments:
Post a Comment